Free Market Disaster
The current financial crisis grew out of politicized government
policy and a shared belief among business elites to support a
laissez-fair, free market, anti-tax economy unhindered by
regulations. And ordinary citizens are paying the price of a system
rigged to the advantage of those who manipulate capital.
"The foreclosure crisis is a man-made phenomena," said David M.
Abromowitz, senior fellow for the Center for American Progress. "It's
not just the side effect of a normal market cycle. There was a push
to boost home ownership and a pattern of under regulating financial
services and support from all kinds of businesses to allow the free
market to take over."
The crisis originated in Allen Greenspan's decision to lower Federal
interest rates to protect the economy from recession after the
Internet stock bubble and 9/11 imperiled the economy. While the Fed
kept interest rates low, investors sought higher returns and real
estate appeared undervalued.
Although housing costs had risen at a yearly rate of 1.8% over
inflation since the Carter presidency, they shot up an average of 7%
a year from 2000 to 2004. Easy money under Bush's policy of an
"ownership society" increased ownership rates 1.4% and pushed the
cost of the median home from $130,000 in 2000 to a peak of $221,900
"Obviously, the policy and economy under this president has radically
accelerated American debt," said Max Fraad Wolff, an economist with
Global Macroscope. "Household debt doubled since Bush came into
office and the president's dream of an 'ownership society' has become
an 'owership reality.'"
Wages remained stagnant; adjusted for inflation, hourly wages fell
below those of 1972. In 2007, the Census Report found median
household income was $1000 less than in 2000, and those living in
poverty increased by 5 million.
"Americans have been struggling to live middle class lives without
middle class wages for 25 years," Wolff said. "Every member of the
household is now at work and they still can't make ends meet in a
consumer society that now demands an enormous amount of debt."
The answer to low pay was obvious to most families; make up for lost
wages by increasing debt burden and treating the home like bank
accounts. "Recently, more of American's increase in household cash
flow has come more from housing than from earnings," said Wolff. "The
amount of money extracted from the housing bubble is larger than the
total increase in wages and salary. It's an enormous amount of
purchasing power, equivalent to many years of total salary increases."
In 2000, Phil Gramm, the Texan who headed the Senate Banking
Committee, pushed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act through a
Republican Congress. The bill prevented the regulation of
"derivatives," exotic, complex, little understood investment
packages, such as "collateralized debt obligations," which operated
in a gray zone of nebulous trading. Innovative subprime or adjustable
rate, 100% financed, no down payment, negatively amortized mortgages
were bundled and sold to investors, with no oversight.
"They created a situation where people didn't know what was in
packaged pools of mortgages, so no one knew their value," said
Abromowitz. "When all regulations were pulled back to let the free
market take over, creative people did what they normally do, made
more money. This lead to an over-hyped market."
Borrowing on homes reached 6 times earnings, home equity borrowing
increased 1400% from 1999 to 2006, and homeowners extracted $2
trillion from their homes. Savings fell to the lowest rate since the
Great Depression. Total household debt doubled from 1999 to 2007 to a
sum higher than all debt accumulated in the nation's history.
Household mortgages increased 50% in the past 7 years to $2.5
trillion, and credit card debt rose to a record $790 billion.
In February, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer revealed in the
Washington Post that the governors of 50 states warned that mortgage
practices, including "deceptive 'teaser' rates that later ballooned
astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or
even paying illegal kickbacks," represented a "looming national
crisis" that would have a "devastating effect on home buyers."
The Bush Administration "embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented
campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents" by
directing the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to
preempt predatory lending laws. When Spitzer persisted in his
investigation, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop him. According
to Spitzer, Bush was "a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to
any lengths in their quest for profits."
Since the mortgage meltdown began last summer, different
"derivatives," now amounting to over $45.5 trillion, started going
under. Bailout packages abounded; Congress approved a "rescue"
package worth $168 billion, and the Fed lowered interest rates five
times since September to "stabilize" credit markets. In March, the
Fed engineered the sale of Bear Stearns to JPMorgan and, for the
first time since the Depression, accepted as collateral $400 billion
in mortgage derivatives from unregulated financial institutions.
Whether the bailouts will work remains to be seen; each Fed move is
stymied by failure in another part of the market. Considering the
radical Bush administration policies and the power of financial
institutions to influence government, the free market is bound to be
bumpy, if not disastrous.
First time print publication
rights in circulation area.
Found your site on digital point forums.
I can't wait for the bottom to drop out from under the San Diego housing market.
Gentleman start your foreclosure engines.
I realize this is a humor site, but does no one care about the issue of personal responsibility in their rush to lay all blame for everything at the feet of the government (the government we elected)? All during the last several years I shuddered at the advertising urging homeowners to spend their equity, and at the statistics that proved that people were doing just that. But the fact is that they chose to do it and if they didn't know what they were agreeing to that is not the government's fault.